Road Reckoner penalty guidance Fixed Fee Legal Advice Road Traffic Solicitors Car Insurance with Points Drink Driving Motor Accidents Table of Driving Offences Worthless Speed Camera Rules Notices of Intended Prosecution Driving Offence Details Endorsements, Disqualifications & Revocations Seat Belts Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
Injured in an accident? Not your fault? Use our free Claim on the Web service to see if you can claim - CLICK HERE

click here to go to the LAW on the WEB Home Page (frames)Caught on Camera?
updated 25 July 2007

Looks like a potential legal loophole that had been exposed in road traffic legislation has been firmly sewn shut by a recent Privy Council ruling in the case of Margaret Brown (05/12/00).

Prior to their ruling there had been lower court decisions in both Scotland and England, which indicated that asking drivers to confirm whether they were the driver of the car at the time of an offence was contrary to Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and was therefore illegal. Without such evidence many speed camera prosecutions would simply fail as the driver could not be established.

However the five law lords, sitting as the Privy Council, which is now the final court of appeal on devolution cases from Scotland, have now ruled that such evidence is admissible, as the driver's right to a fair trial and privacy has to be balanced with the right to safety of the wider community.

The decision is binding on both the courts in England and Scotland.

   

Complaints I Conveyancing Quote I Divorce I DIY Law I Employment I Family Law I Financial Compensation Claims I Find a Solicitor I EPA I Law on the Phone I Law Online I Law Student I Legal Advice I Legal Basics I Legal Fun I Legal News I Links I Mediation I Motoring Law I Press I Property Dispute I Search I Solicitors I The Law ShopWebster - Our Guide Dog I Wills and Probate I Home (Frames) I Home (No Frames)